Wednesday, January 31, 2007
Thursday, January 25, 2007
CADはデコンの原因であるか. . . !?
2 years ago in the celebration party of my JIA design award,Mr.Takeda,a welknown face to Japanese architects as a Contemporary Theorist and Critic, asked me about my design background and Architectural Education in Bangladesh.He was eager to know,how western architecture has influenced the oriental architects and students to follow (and often to make replica!!) it's styles in their local practice; or in other words,trends of architecture in 3rd world countries.I just can remember I talked a lot about contemporarty trends of architecture in Bangladesh,though I myself didn't have schooling background in any Bangladeshi arch.school.Meanwhile I was introduced with some Japanese architects worked in Bangladesh and quite aware of recent state of Architecture in Dhaka.Their experience was really shocking!!One of them told me Dhaka is becoming a city of Replica Architecture,very few architects are working honestly in an ethical way of practice.Can you imagine how did I feel at that time?!
Anyway,I just want to say,'Making good replica of a famous building' can never be treated as Architectural practice.So please never make any comment on it.
Sorry for running far from the topic!!Just want to talk about 'Deconstruction ' vs.'CAD'.
- Deconstructivism in architecture, also called deconstruction, is a development of postmodern architecture that began in the late 1980s. It is characterized by ideas of fragmentation, non-linear processes of design, an interest in manipulating ideas of a structure's surface or skin, and apparent non-Euclidean geometry which serve to distort and dislocate some of the elements of architecture, such as structure and envelope. The finished visual appearance of buildings that exhibit the many deconstructivist "styles" is characterised by a stimulating unpredictability and a controlled chaos.
Originally, some of the architects known as Deconstructivists were influenced by the ideas of the French philosopher Jacques Derrida. Eisenman, developed a personal relationship with Derrida, but even so, his approach to architectural design was developed long before he became a Deconstructivist. For him Deconstructivism should be considered an extension of his interest in radical formalism. Deconstructivism was also influenced by the formal experimentation and geometric imbalances of Russian constructivist. There are additional references in deconstructivism to 20th-century movements: the modernism/postmodernism interplay, expressionism, cubism, minimalism and contemporary art. The attempt in deconstructivism throughout is to move architecture away from what its practitioners see as the constricting 'rules' of modernism such as "form follows function", "purity of form", "truth to materials".
Computer aided design(CAD) is now an essential tool in most aspects of contemporary architecture, but the particular nature of deconstrucivism makes the use of computers especially pertinent. Three-dimensional modelling and animation (virtual and physical) assists in the conception of very complex spaces, while the ability to link computer models to manufacturing jigs (CAM - Computer Aided manufacturing) allows the mass production of subtly different modular elements to be achieved at affordable costs. In retrospect many early deconstructivist works appear to have been conceived with the aid of a computer, but were not; Zaha Hadid's sketches for instance. Also, Gehry is noted for producing many physical models as well as computer models as part of his design process. Though the computer has made the designing of complex shapes much easier, not everything that looks odd is "deconstructivist."
In that party I was asked by some other people,why my presentation board looked like that...why it's not like other Japanese perticipants,etc.As a blind fan of Morphosis I myself was not too sure,whether it's influence of Deconstructivists(not programmatic rather in formal decons't approch) or using 3d simulation softwares as my design tool.Whatever the reason behind,I am sure about my method that never proves me as a Deconstructivist.
Monday, January 22, 2007
Friday, January 19, 2007

sketchーⅢ
Facilities:The International Forum includes two theaters, one among the largest in the world, over 6,000 square meters of exhibition space, several conference rooms, restaurants, shops and other amenities.
Sunday, January 14, 2007
Friday, January 12, 2007
Thursday, January 11, 2007


建築見学ー2004
- Site-context:The 70m/430m terminal building is positioned orthogonally to the Yokohama water-front and Yamashita park.
- The fundamental approach: According to the architect, the fundamental approach of the design was the intension to transform the ground into an active surface, a built-up layout plan from which the architectural elements emerge as improbable and fluctuating forms.
Here the building itself becomes a surface of different intensities and controlling the traffic flows between the city and the port, the inhabitants and the ship passengers. In fact here the surface becomes pleated to channel the traffic lanes while also playing its structural role.
The ground of the city is connected to the boarding level and from there it bifurcates. I think it encourages the interaction between the URBAN SPACE and the TERMINAL below. - Formal-expression: The structure is comparatively linear along its length. As a form it has a very dynamic look. You can feel that your body is close to the large part of the structure, but you would be distant from the feeling the weight of the structure. The wood planking, hand rails and constant see view emphasize the image of a ship.
- The functional spaces and the interior: the whole structure is divided into 3 layers : (1)the basement layer is the machinery.
(2)the 1st floor is for parking area ,emergency centre etc.(3)the 2nd floor is for the passenger terminal and the multipurpose hall (4)the roof-top plaza and the visitors’ deck.
The roof top has gentle 2 directional curves. The interior of the building has no columns or beams, creating a specious environment. There are no stairs, creating a barrier free environment where the visitors move between the levels by slopes or the elevators. - Into the belly of the Beast:
Entering the terminal feels like being swallowed by a huge pre-historic creature with a strong and heavy skeleton. - The structural system: It’s a steel-frame structure. The ceiling is of folded plate-structure. It is made of projecting triangles across the grain contrasting with the length of the building. The column-free space is spanned by main trusses and rest on the box girders.
- Conclusion:
FOA created a building that fits smoothly into this context, surrounded by a skyline that speaks of environment. I think this terminal is an interface between the open sea and the dense Tokyo-Yokohama metropolis. It is also a transition space between local people and the strangers. For locals its main function is as a park and for the arrivals it is the first connection with the main land.
Sunday, January 07, 2007
SK

Friday, January 05, 2007
